Proposal Stage

At this stage, propose new work project proposals, including technical areas, goals, and preliminary plans. The proposal needs to undergo review and voting, and ultimately decide whether to establish a working group for further work.

Proposal Initiator

Action content:

  • Identify and define specific areas or requirements that require standardization.

  • Prepare preliminary proposals, including the purpose of the standards, expected benefits, technical basis, etc.

product:

  • Preliminary proposal document, elaborating on standardization requirements and the basic principles of the proposal.

secretariat

Action content:

  • Provide guidance and templates for proposal preparation.

  • Assist the initiating unit in improving the content of the proposal to ensure that it meets the requirements of the committee.

  • Provide standardized proposal formats and guidelines.

  • The NWIP document completed by Concord.

Standardization Committee

Professional Evaluation:

  • Technical evaluation of the proposal shall be conducted by at least 5 experts from the relevant field's standardization committee members.

The working group is preparing:

  • If the proposal is deemed valuable, the committee may establish a working group to prepare the draft.

policy decision:

  • Based on the evaluation results and voting, decide whether to proceed with the proposal.

Pretrial Phase

At this stage, the working group begins drafting standard drafts, which are discussed and revised through offensive and defensive meetings to ensure the quality and completeness of the drafts.

Input

  • NWIP files that have been approved

  • Knowledge and experience of team members

  • Related technical materials and references

  • Research on Similar Standards at Home and Abroad

Activity

  • Designated or established by the Standardization Committee, responsible for specific drafting work

  • Regularly hold meetings to discuss the specific technical content of the standards

  • Draft Standards (Working Group Draft, WD)

  • Internal review and modification improvement

Output

  • Working Group Draft (WD)

  • project progress report

  • Technical difficulties and solution explanation

  • The committee reviews the application materials

Proposal Stage

Formally approve the project launch, establish a working group, and develop a detailed work plan and schedule.

Input

  • Working Group Draft (WD)

  • Technical justification and supporting materials

  • Explanation of revision suggestions from the working group

  • List of Committee Members and Contact Information

Activity

  • Internal technical review of WD by the committee

  • Collect modification suggestions from committee members

  • The working group revised the draft based on the opinions

  • Formulate a more mature committee draft (CD)

Output

  • Committee Draft (CD)

  • Meeting minutes and modification records

  • Summary of Committee Review Comments

  • Next step work plan

Enquiry Stage

Members of the working group collaborate to write standard texts and conduct multiple rounds of internal reviews and revisions.

Input

  • Committee Draft (CD)

  • Template for Opinion Collection Announcement

  • Stakeholder Contact List

  • Opinion handling process and standards

Activity

  • Publish the draft standard on the official website for feedback collection

  • Invite all stakeholders and the public to provide feedback

  • Ensure the widespread dissemination of opinion solicitation notices through multiple channels

  • The working group consolidates and processes all opinions

Output

  • Opinion Summary and Handling Report

  • Revised Inquiry Draft (DIS)

  • Statistics on Public Participation

  • Explanation of Major Divergent Issues

Review Stage

Solicit opinions from all members of the committee and organize a technical review meeting.

Input

  • Revised Inquiry Draft (DIS)

  • Opinion Handling Report

  • Voting forms and explanatory documents

  • Final review meeting materials

Activity

  • Conduct final technical review of the draft standard

  • Committee experts conduct final review

  • Organize the final vote

  • Fine tune according to the final opinion

Output

  • Voting results and review report

  • Final Draft Standard Text (FDIS)

  • Standard number and metadata

  • Release Preparation Checklist

Approval stage

After making revisions based on the review comments, submit to the committee for final voting.

definition

Conduct a final technical review of the draft standard to ensure that all technical content is accurate and meets all necessary requirements.

Reviewed by

Members of the Standardization Committee Presidium (or their designated experts)

Release Phase

Formally release standard documents for promotion and implementation guidance.

Secretariat

Responsible for the entire publishing process, including final approval of documents, formatting, copyright processing, distribution, and promotion. Support the publication of electronic documents to ensure their accessibility on official websites or other online platforms.

Drafting Group

At this stage, confirm the accuracy and technical completeness of the manuscript content to ensure that all modifications have been completed and meet the publishing standards.

Review And Revision

Regularly review standards and revise or update them based on technological developments.

project proposal

The process of obtaining, filling out, and submitting a project application is as follows:

How to obtain it?

Apply and obtain through email with the alliance and committee. Contact email: ciapst@ciapst.org

How to fill in?

After obtaining the application form, please fill it out; Mainly filled in by the initiating unit: guidance provided by the Secretariat:

How to submit?

Please send the application form in electronic scanned form to the email address ciapst@ciapst.org Paper original price mailed to the country office